| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 |
1781. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Matriarch Prime wrote: What I don't understand is how it is fine for the ganker to not fit tank, but the it is somehow a failing on the gankee's part to not fit enough. Neither is an optimal strategy. So lets not play dumb. If the miners are ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.08 00:24:00
|
1782. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: And it's always been said that if they HAD tanked - ganking would STILL have been unprofitable. BOTH responses achieved the same outcome. It's faffing labouring on that point. No. If they had tanked their ships, then ga...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 23:53:00
|
1783. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: Well aware of T1 insurance and limited on T2. That's what CAUSED the problem in the first place. No, it didn't. What caused the problem in the first place had absolutely nothing to do with the price of whatever ship was...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 23:51:00
|
1784. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: I'm asking for a reversal - with conditions to remove the ability for a miner to go "mental" again. No. What you want is to make the act of flying T2 ships hurt less. That's not going to happen.
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 23:23:00
|
1785. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: - I don't want CCP waving the magic wand to mitigate risk for stupid. So you're in favour of a reversal of the mining barge/exhumer changes, then, since that's exactly what those changes are doing. Touval Lysander wr...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 23:18:00
|
1786. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: Except to those who actively mitigate their risks. There is such a thing in place, it's called downgrading to the T1 variant if you can't take the heat. Touval Lysander wrote: Seriously. So we can't have a system wh...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 22:45:00
|
1787. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Insurance in eve don't mimic anything resembling RL insurance. "oh certainly sir, you'll want platinum insurance on your warship. And you'll be flying it in a fleet fight tomorrow, you say? Certainly no problem, that'll be some money." the day af...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 21:58:00
|
1788. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: We repeatedly try to mimic the market to the model we use in RL. And yet, I can insure a BMW (for higher premiums ofc) and it does not create inflationary pressure at all. Not even remotely the same thing. The insurance...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 21:30:00
|
1789. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That face matches that post perfectly.
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 21:12:00
|
1790. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: TLDR just for you. The call for proper mining insurance was made a long time ago. That would have solved the gankers and miners problems without any buffs/nerfs to either party. The miner would never have cared much abou...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 21:06:00
|
1791. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Touval Lysander wrote: Which would have made it unprofitable. And would've been a soft touch tweak to reduce the ganking that was going on. Instead, they decided to blow it out of the water with an atom bomb. Touval Lysander wrote: And ma...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 20:29:00
|
1792. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh look an old video of how concord was years ago before they got buffed gee I am so convinced now
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 18:14:00
|
1793. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In which universe?
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 17:40:00
|
1794. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weiland Taur wrote: Can't say I agree with making it harder. It's really easy to avoid gankers if people put the work into it but I also think gankers need to stop acting like victims. If you want to be a pirate then problem solve like one. ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 15:18:00
|
1795. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Lord Zim wrote: So much nonsense You "assume" too much. You take your assumptions for facts and post accordingly, you're actually making of yourself the pro boot finder and I'd strongly recommend you to get Shr...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 13:56:00
|
1796. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: Pipa Porto wrote: I'm saying that Battleclinic is terrible at being a killboard. Same Date, Same Time, Same System, Same Victim, Same number of people involved, Same Damage Taken, same Kill. Why do you keep doubling ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 13:44:00
|
1797. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Yes please, show us all your bot-o-meter detector and prove your words because right now my sh+»t-o-meter while exploring your post is exploding. Warp to any hisec ice belt, and you can safely assume that a large m...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 13:41:00
|
1798. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Yes tell me how much at Jita market average prices those catalyst cost: 1.4M But you actually over estimate and have far too much adoration for your so beloved market economy you're about to tell me the dow jones is ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 13:26:00
|
1799. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: baltec1 wrote: Weiland Taur wrote: Is there any proof that gankers made any impact on the number of bots or simply drove them to null and the backwaters of the major powers there? Most of the miners that I kn...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 13:23:00
|
1800. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Still waiting for that catalyst contract. Hell, I'll even pay 250k each.
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.07 13:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |